Actually my thoughts can fit in two sentences.
Protocols and claims don't matter. Verifiable and repeatable results do.
That's it.
I wouldn't care if I had to sit in a tree and chant and drink tea, as long as in a double-blind study it showed that was what got people better than surgery or BCGs.
If the bottom line is that when we measure and define things the same, and if European bottom-line results are better--longer term survival, fewer recurrences, fewer bad side-efects--I would definitely want those European protocols used in this country.
Apples and apples. Like I said in another thread, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Believe me, I want to get better. Better yet, I want to get well. If the protocols of another country or another planet can help, I'm all for it.
But I'd like some proof. I'm 50, and my days of climbing trees are, sadly, over.
Zach
P.S.--I was in our local vitamin store several years ago and a salesgirl came up and asked if she could help me find something. Just for fun, I asked if she had anything that could cure cancer. Believe it or not, she didn't hesitate a second. She led me right to a bunch of bottles of herbs and Chinese-labeled bottles and told me that these definitely could cure cancer. I feel incredibly sad and frustrated at the poor souls who took that route instead of proper treatment.