I have heard from Pam again and she wrote back with the info on the path report. So here it is. I have never been good at deciphering these.
Webs
Final diagnosis:
Part 1 : urinary bladder , tumor base, cystoscopic biopsy { oss s09-3305,1A 10/26/09 nason hospital
A.Single fragmant of necroinflammatory debris.
B. No evidence of carcinoma.
Part 2 : urinary bladde , base of previous tumor , transurethral resection {oss s09-335,2A , 10/26/09 nason hospital
A. One of multiple urothelial mucsoa fragments with foal urothelial dysplasia{ see comment}
B.Focal mild scute inflammation of lamina propria.
C.No evidence of invasive urthelial carcinoma.
D. detrusor muscle is present and is negative for carcinoma.
AFL/AFL
Comment:
Part 2 : multiple tissue fragments are examined in part 2 . One fragment is lined by urothelial mucosa with features of atypia , icluding nucleomegaly and numerous mitotic fiures. the atypia seen is below the level of what is required for carcinoma in-situ,and is therfore best clasified as dysplasia. However on evidence of carcinoma is seen.
I do not see stage or garde spelled out in this one as in first one . Thanks ,