a TURB is what your husband had done..a transurethral resection of the bladder(he actually had a TURBP which includes the prostate)...but since he did not get it all it is very dubious in my mind whether he got the requisite muscle that you must have for a correct pathology report. If it is understaged which it has been found that over 50% are when not done at a major cancer or university center that deals with lots of bladder cancer...and if it indeed could be muscle invasive than BCG the uro is proposing would have disasterous effects.
At the very least if you do not want to travel have the pathology slides sent to someplace like Johns Hopkins for review and second opinion. They're #1 in Urology and they will not make a mistake. You can send them and pathology will wrap them up for you or you can have the pathology dept. send them.
here is a link and they will help you..
pathology.jhu.edu/department/services/consults/urologic.cfm
This is something everyone should do. I found out after i got breast cancer last year that automatically the surgeon sent out the slides to the top pathologist in the country to confirm. We need to do the same with bladder cancer.
The skill of the surgeon is the single most solitary consideration when you have bladder cancer.
pat